Cervical stiffness measurements as a predictive test for spontaneous preterm birth
Presented by Hannah Rosen O’Sullivan
Objective
– To determine if cervical stiffness measurements differ between those delivering
term and preterm
– To determine if cervical stiffness measurements correlate with cervical length,
fetal fibronectin (fFN) and other biomarkers
– To determine if cervical stiffness measurements can predict risk of spontaneous
preterm birth in an asymptomatic high risk population
Study Designs
– Observational study – serial cervical stiffness measurements at 5 gestational
timepoints taken from asymptomatic women at high risk of spontaneous preterm birth
– Cervical stiffness measurements taken using an aspiration device (Pregnolia system)
– Device consists of a control unit, tubing and a small cup, which is placed on the
anterior lip of the cervix during speculum examination, a weak vacuum is created
which aspirates the cervical tissue to a depth of 4mm and records the amount of pressure
required to do this (mbar)
– Paired cervical length, quantitative fFN and high vaginal swabs taken
Results
– Cervical stiffness is significantly lower in women delivering preterm compared
to those delivering at term (mean cervical stiffness term 71.9 mbar, mean cervical stiffness preterm 40.0, p=0.04)
– There is correlation between cervical stiffness and gestation at delivery, cervical
length and fetal fibronectin
– Area under the curve for cervical stiffness as a predictive test for spontaneous preterm
birth <37 weeks in this cohort = 0.8, compared with the AUC for cervical length = 0.7 and
fetal fibronectin = 0.67.
Conclusion
– Cervical stiffness measurements appear to be a good predictive test for risk of
spontaneous preterm birth <37 weeks in a high-risk asymptomatic population
and warrants ongoing investigation
– Further groups to be added including a threatened preterm labour cohort
Author(s)
Hannah Rosen O’Sullivan, Natalie Suff, Nicole Moriarty, Andrew Shennan
Downloads